<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Satisfaction: People-powered Customer Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2007/08/02/satisfaction-people-powered-customer-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2007/08/02/satisfaction-people-powered-customer-service/</link>
	<description>Adam Darowski is a daddy of two and User Experience Designer for BatchBlue Software.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:32:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Darowski</title>
		<link>http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2007/08/02/satisfaction-people-powered-customer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-27782</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Darowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 15:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2007/08/02/satisfaction-people-powered-customer-service/#comment-27782</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;How would you contrast this with a convential 3rd party threaded forum? For instance, perhaps a site like Notebookreview.com? Or even forum.thinkpads.com (not owned / sponsored by IBM or Lenovo, yet dedicated to the products?) What is lacking in those scenarios, is direct company participation. It‚Äôs all customer based.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think you answered the question right there. What I see that is different is that they allow the company to &quot;officially&quot; join the discussion.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I agree satisfaction looks different, but I think it‚Äôs trying to accomplish the same idea. Right?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d say it is doing it in a far more wide-reaching (more companies and conversations) and organized way. It&#039;s really easy to jump from company discussion to company discussion.

Not to mention, something has to be said for the implementation. Satisfaction is just ... slick. Something you can&#039;t really get from just an off the shelf forum (unless it is highly tweaked). Let&#039;s face it, forums have way too many features that just aren&#039;t used.

Things like the emoticons in Satsifaction are really taking off. So, people enjoy using it.

Maybe that leads to more realistic discussion instead of flame wars...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>How would you contrast this with a convential 3rd party threaded forum? For instance, perhaps a site like Notebookreview.com? Or even forum.thinkpads.com (not owned / sponsored by IBM or Lenovo, yet dedicated to the products?) What is lacking in those scenarios, is direct company participation. It‚Äôs all customer based.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think you answered the question right there. What I see that is different is that they allow the company to &#8220;officially&#8221; join the discussion.</p>
<blockquote><p>I agree satisfaction looks different, but I think it‚Äôs trying to accomplish the same idea. Right?</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d say it is doing it in a far more wide-reaching (more companies and conversations) and organized way. It&#8217;s really easy to jump from company discussion to company discussion.</p>
<p>Not to mention, something has to be said for the implementation. Satisfaction is just &#8230; slick. Something you can&#8217;t really get from just an off the shelf forum (unless it is highly tweaked). Let&#8217;s face it, forums have way too many features that just aren&#8217;t used.</p>
<p>Things like the emoticons in Satsifaction are really taking off. So, people enjoy using it.</p>
<p>Maybe that leads to more realistic discussion instead of flame wars&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2007/08/02/satisfaction-people-powered-customer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-27642</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 22:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2007/08/02/satisfaction-people-powered-customer-service/#comment-27642</guid>
		<description>Adam,

So this is a discussion facilitation site?  How would you contrast this with a convential 3rd party threaded forum?   For instance, perhaps a site like Notebookreview.com?  Or even forum.thinkpads.com (not owned / sponsored by IBM or Lenovo, yet dedicated to the products?) What is lacking in those scenarios, is direct company participation.  It&#039;s all customer based. I agree satisfaction looks different, but I think it&#039;s trying to accomplish the same idea.  Right?  Please do clarify my misunderstanding... 

I&#039;m personally interested in how we (everyone) can evolve the old model of seller/buyer, producer/consumer, company/customer, into more of a partnership.
I suggest partnership, because so far, individuals and companies are still just using social media as a new way to perpetuate conventional self interested thinking.  Monitoring - what are they saying, blog posting for PR, customer&#039;s posting to get help, or making noise to try to leverage a change in policy, or to get some concession. etc.  (I&#039;m painting with a big, sloppy generalization brush here , I know)


The breakthrough could come where the producing/consuming ecosystem of the world becomes more obvious to everyone and we stop trying to manage solely to our individual (or collective) self interests. (again, the big generalization brush - no personal indictments) The partnership idea implies a symbiosis that goes beyond the transaction at point of sale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>So this is a discussion facilitation site?  How would you contrast this with a convential 3rd party threaded forum?   For instance, perhaps a site like Notebookreview.com?  Or even forum.thinkpads.com (not owned / sponsored by IBM or Lenovo, yet dedicated to the products?) What is lacking in those scenarios, is direct company participation.  It&#8217;s all customer based. I agree satisfaction looks different, but I think it&#8217;s trying to accomplish the same idea.  Right?  Please do clarify my misunderstanding&#8230; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m personally interested in how we (everyone) can evolve the old model of seller/buyer, producer/consumer, company/customer, into more of a partnership.<br />
I suggest partnership, because so far, individuals and companies are still just using social media as a new way to perpetuate conventional self interested thinking.  Monitoring &#8211; what are they saying, blog posting for PR, customer&#8217;s posting to get help, or making noise to try to leverage a change in policy, or to get some concession. etc.  (I&#8217;m painting with a big, sloppy generalization brush here , I know)</p>
<p>The breakthrough could come where the producing/consuming ecosystem of the world becomes more obvious to everyone and we stop trying to manage solely to our individual (or collective) self interests. (again, the big generalization brush &#8211; no personal indictments) The partnership idea implies a symbiosis that goes beyond the transaction at point of sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
