<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Text on the Web is Getting Smaller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2009/11/09/why-text-on-the-web-is-getting-smaller/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2009/11/09/why-text-on-the-web-is-getting-smaller/</link>
	<description>Adam Darowski is a daddy of two and User Experience Designer for BatchBlue Software.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:29:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Chupp</title>
		<link>http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2009/11/09/why-text-on-the-web-is-getting-smaller/comment-page-1/#comment-172638</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Chupp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/?p=983#comment-172638</guid>
		<description>Interesting post that provides some hard data on something we&#039;re all suffering from.  LFC looks compelling.  I&#039;m a big fan of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://lab.arc90.com/experiments/readability/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Readablity bookmarklets&lt;/a&gt; by Arc90.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post that provides some hard data on something we&#8217;re all suffering from.  LFC looks compelling.  I&#8217;m a big fan of the <a href="http://lab.arc90.com/experiments/readability/" rel="nofollow">Readablity bookmarklets</a> by Arc90.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred LeBlanc</title>
		<link>http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2009/11/09/why-text-on-the-web-is-getting-smaller/comment-page-1/#comment-172509</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred LeBlanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/?p=983#comment-172509</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny when I tell people about the 16px rule of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://largefontcoalition.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Large Font Coalition&lt;/a&gt;. It can also be described in your stylesheet as 100%. Pretty amazing, eh?

16px only looks gigantic because people trying changing their design&#039;s content to 16px when it was say 12px before. Of course it looks gigantic and out of place. For one thing, you&#039;ve gotten used to the 12px. Secondly, the other elements of the design were built with the assumption of a 12px context.

If you start your designs with 16px in mind, it looks as normal as any 12px would. (Or, for example, once you&#039;ve built a design with 16px in mind, change the font size to 12px. You&#039;ll hear the same number of complaints of &quot;too tiny&quot; as you did during the previous attempt of arbitrarily switching 12px to 16px which was said to be &quot;too large.&quot;)

Large fonts are awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny when I tell people about the 16px rule of the <a href="http://largefontcoalition.org" rel="nofollow">Large Font Coalition</a>. It can also be described in your stylesheet as 100%. Pretty amazing, eh?</p>
<p>16px only looks gigantic because people trying changing their design&#8217;s content to 16px when it was say 12px before. Of course it looks gigantic and out of place. For one thing, you&#8217;ve gotten used to the 12px. Secondly, the other elements of the design were built with the assumption of a 12px context.</p>
<p>If you start your designs with 16px in mind, it looks as normal as any 12px would. (Or, for example, once you&#8217;ve built a design with 16px in mind, change the font size to 12px. You&#8217;ll hear the same number of complaints of &#8220;too tiny&#8221; as you did during the previous attempt of arbitrarily switching 12px to 16px which was said to be &#8220;too large.&#8221;)</p>
<p>Large fonts are awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Amos</title>
		<link>http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2009/11/09/why-text-on-the-web-is-getting-smaller/comment-page-1/#comment-172508</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/?p=983#comment-172508</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Very&lt;/em&gt; nice post here, Adam. I&#039;m proud to say that I dabble with 16px and 14px font-sizes on the few websites I&#039;m in complete control of.

Large Fonts 4 LYF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Very</em> nice post here, Adam. I&#8217;m proud to say that I dabble with 16px and 14px font-sizes on the few websites I&#8217;m in complete control of.</p>
<p>Large Fonts 4 LYF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coryndon Luxmoore</title>
		<link>http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2009/11/09/why-text-on-the-web-is-getting-smaller/comment-page-1/#comment-172505</link>
		<dc:creator>Coryndon Luxmoore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/?p=983#comment-172505</guid>
		<description>Yup totally agree. I am the bain of many graphic designers as I do all my wireframes with a base font of 14pt. Once the client has gotten used to that size they resist going back ;)

14pt btw was very well received in some usability tests I conducted with 35-50yr old users. 50-70yrs old did not complain or comment (probably due to almost all having reading glasses or bifocals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup totally agree. I am the bain of many graphic designers as I do all my wireframes with a base font of 14pt. Once the client has gotten used to that size they resist going back <img src='http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>14pt btw was very well received in some usability tests I conducted with 35-50yr old users. 50-70yrs old did not complain or comment (probably due to almost all having reading glasses or bifocals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/2009/11/09/why-text-on-the-web-is-getting-smaller/comment-page-1/#comment-172504</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darowski.com/tracesofinspiration/?p=983#comment-172504</guid>
		<description>Wow, that&#039;s really cool. I kinda wondered about pixel-shrinking (no double entendre or pun intended), but I was never sure how to calculate it. To be honest, I thought a pixel was a fixed measurement, like a bit, byte, or meter.

My standard font size is typically 14px. Not quite at LFC standards, but closer than most.

Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s really cool. I kinda wondered about pixel-shrinking (no double entendre or pun intended), but I was never sure how to calculate it. To be honest, I thought a pixel was a fixed measurement, like a bit, byte, or meter.</p>
<p>My standard font size is typically 14px. Not quite at LFC standards, but closer than most.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

